Home > Uncategorized > Box 3 – Framing attributes of Internet adoption in CSOs: Miles’ approach

Box 3 – Framing attributes of Internet adoption in CSOs: Miles’ approach

Saturday, 29 December 2007 Leave a comment Go to comments

How can perceived attributes [in the adoption of the Internet in Indonesian CSOs] be explained within diffusion theory and CSO study at the same time? Ian Miles (1996) provides an insight to understand competing perspective in ICTs. In his work, he departs from the concern about the classic debate on ‘consensus v. conflict’ which has long been pathological in social science –that in fact also perfectly matches with the spectrum of ‘activism paradigm’ in CSOs*.

Typology of Views of ICT and information society

Source: Miles (1996:41)

Miles’ work is grounded around the prominent theme of ‘expanding information opportunities v. growing information inequalities’, which might be helpful to understand the latent problem of access availability or digital divide issue underlying the adoption process in developing economies like Indonesia (Miles, 1996:39-40). To him, there are two important dimensions underlying the debate on the social implications of ICTs, i.e. dimension of depth and width. In the dimension of depth, it is the speed and extent of ‘change’ which is very much influential, with continuist and transformist at the extremes. In the dimension of width, it is the extent of control that matters, with concordist competing against antagonist (Miles, 1996:38-40). For both dimensions, Miles offers structuralism to remedy the ills by looking for synthesis as it recognises that a diversity of actors confront a multiplicity of choices which lead to many possible outcomes.

Read the rest of the article here.

Source: Miles (1996), interview from fieldwork, and author’s reflection
* See Chapter Four Section 4.1.1. Sphere of activism for more detailed accounts.
(PhD Thesis, Nugroho, 2007:175 – Box 5.1.)

Categories: Uncategorized
  1. Sunday, 30 December 2007 at 12:00 am

    Sing penting kuwi, teknologi yang dipunyai bisa dimanfaatkan sebaik-baiknya. Lha piye, kadang LSM yo gaptek (gagap teknologi) gitu kok. Lha wong ada excel yang canggih gitu dan bisa ngetung cepet yo tidak dipake fasilitas tersebut. Lha kok ngerti? Yo ngerti, wong aku mbiyen dhewe yo ngono kok. hua…ha…ha…Yang kedua adalah dokumentasi. Lha aku wis tahu kok mbiyen ngelihat LSM yang datanya nyebar kemana-mana nggak jelas, kalau mau nyari bingung. Padahal kan sudah ada fasilitas untuk menyimpan data dengan baik dan benar. Jadi misale nek digrebeg isih nduwe data…lha untung saiki ora ono grebegan yo. Eh…isih ono ora?

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: